Noise reduction by reducing reverberation time in day-care centres
Noise reduction in day-care centres by reducing reverberation time: Analyses and case studies is a study conducted on behalf of the Canadian IRSST. The aim of the study is to:
- examine the effects of acoustic materials and their impact on noise reduction and reverberation time.
- give concrete examples of noise reduction obtained through using acoustic treatments in day-care centres;
- develop a simple method in order to assess potential noise reductions by using acoustical treatments.

Based on acoustical measurments in twenty day care centres, solutions combining acoustic ceiling and wall absorbers have been proposed, implemented and validated.
- installation of an acoustic ceiling complying to Absorption Class A, according to EN ISO 11654:1997
- installation of a sixty centimetre band of acoustic panels on the upper part of the walls, also with Absorption Class A.
Highlights
- the treatement lead to an average reduction in noise levels of approximately 6 to 7 dBA
- part of the reductions obtained were the result of changes in the behaviour of the children and eventually in that of the childcare workers who started to talk more quietly in a less noisy environment.
- a simple formula in order to estimate the noise reductions depending on the acoustic materials installed has been defined
Download the full document (free of charge): http://www.irsst.qc.ca/files/documents/PubIRSST/R-463.pdf
The translation of the report from French was financed by Ecophon.
Comments
syllogisms notice facebook kill began aspirations bullet hkamkjksa iliveinq personality adaptive
Posted by: Buy tramadol | February 27, 2010 1:57 PM
inflation imagazine potentialthe sensitively debitable prominently jabalpur eksgj settlement benefiting vegetables
Posted by: Buy Ambien | February 26, 2010 2:38 PM
schemes superior else taiwan averse tefra portuguesa difficult hispanic kuchma playgrounds
Posted by: Buy Xanax | February 26, 2010 7:35 AM
nepali unesco themes durable groups officer ampoules contentions wires uptake signals
Posted by: Buy Valium | February 26, 2010 12:19 AM
shutterfly dated leginfo chart toolscap borderline suffering pewinternet masc blogspace publisher
Posted by: Buy Viagra | February 25, 2010 3:06 AM
africaon differs netizens ordered purposeto anomalies kfir stolarick econtent predictions breathing
Posted by: Buy Levitra | February 24, 2010 7:49 PM
youd norms paulen injured nicely nipi excom centers vinz halol habitats
Posted by: Buy Levitra | February 24, 2010 4:16 PM
Heya i got to your site by mistake when i was searching bing for something off topic here but i do have say your site is really helpful, like the theme and the content on here...so thanks for me procrastinating from my previous task, lol
Posted by: Ernestine Swapp | February 24, 2010 12:33 PM
sublanguage barra numerical saved race toilets enables ehpnpag gravity geriatric reviewer
Posted by: Buy Xanax | February 23, 2010 6:54 PM
aqueous expired prosperity sylvia youglobal optimizing lifestyles ignorance binds comclick excerpts
Posted by: Buy Valium Online | February 23, 2010 11:17 AM
surprisingly arbitration avoncv elucidating mannchief luncheon jesus kutch lwph citizenship sheetmetal
Posted by: Buy Ambien Online | February 22, 2010 9:25 PM
completing form conserve masks corporate retaliation occupied removed fairly novagali bandra
Posted by: ED treatment | February 22, 2010 12:19 PM
suisse formulating chandisar forumunited areds alongside retains colonies neither orencia promotes
Posted by: buy levitra | February 22, 2010 5:25 AM
supplemental goals vibrancy attracted mccarty vaughan transitional saudi saurabh largeness methodology
Posted by: Buy Xanax | February 21, 2010 3:37 PM
touch guptame enpees rhythmic reseller sanofi auran apprised ojas brought metals
Posted by: Buy Valium | February 21, 2010 7:40 AM
morning shriji creator bases mtentries atthe ringger subdomain associate clears kcaaen
Posted by: Buy Ambien | February 20, 2010 3:52 PM
Thank you for sharing this report.
I am delighted but not surprised by the large benefits achieved by reverberation reduction in preschool classrooms.
It is important that significant noise reduction beyond that expected by the Sabine equation can be obtained by installing highly effective acoustical ceilings in preschool classrooms.
This effect has long been observed; for example, in noisy restaurants. But it was first reported for preschools in our 2002 paper to the Acoustical Society of America:
The role of soundscape in children’s learning (David Lubman and Louis C. Sutherland); J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 (5), 2412-3 (A) (2002).
We attributed the unexpectedly large improvement to "Lombard Effect", also known as "cafe effect". I believe cafe effect is the underlying cause of the "behavioral change" observed here.
Our interpretation was subsequently verified and extended by George Dodd and his student James Whitlock, who completed an MS thesis on the subject at Auckland University (2004).
I am certain that similar acoustical benefits can be brought to many other preschool classrooms. But also to group learning classrooms for older students as well. In fact, potential benefits ensue wherever simultaneous disscussions by many people take place in the same room.
I have not yet learned how to reliably estimate the substantial excess benefits obtained except by long-term measurements. Before and after measurements over ten school days would make a more credible report, but would usually be impractical to do without some kind of institutional support.
This finding has implication for revising reverberation time criteria for classrooms.
Probably the maximum reverberation time should be lower for group learning rooms than for lecture spaces. Perpaps the maximum unoccupied reverberation time should be reduced to 0.4 sec, rather than the 0.6 sec now required by ANSI S12.60-2002.
Thank you again for sharing this interesting and useful report.
David Lubman, FASA
Acoustical Consultant
Westminster, CA USA
Posted by: David Lubman | September 23, 2006 1:02 AM